12-16-2013 02:54 AM
Friends,
Policy
Daily_incremental
Weekly_Full (synthetic)
all of my incrementals on other policies are working but the synthetic. any suggestions would be appreciated?
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-16-2013 04:01 AM
Just set-up & ran my own test policy - thought I'd found an issue but it was 'user error' (apparently if your window is set to open/close on a Sunday it won't run on a Monday!! ).
Once that 'error' was rectified my incremental ran as expected & would expect the synthetic to also (we *do* actually run synthetics on a weekly basis).
Does the incremental appear in the output of nbpemreq?
If syntax is the same (still running an unsupported version here):
nbpemreq -predict -date 12/24/2013 -due
(use nbpemreq -updatepolicies following any policy changes - esp. for immediate tests - if that's still a valid command ;) )
12-16-2013 03:05 AM
Has this ever worked or just started failing?
In the first instance, can we see how this policy is set up:
bppllist POLICY_NAME -U
12-16-2013 03:17 AM
as far as i know it never worked. here is the policy i created as a test - manual full ran as expected but no incremental?
E:\Program Files\Veritas\NetBackup\bin\admincmd>bppllist.exe xDCG -U
------------------------------------------------------------
Policy Name: xDCG
Policy Type: MS-Windows
Active: yes
Effective date: 12/16/2013 10:16:33
Backup network drvs: no
Collect TIR info: yes, with move detection
Mult. Data Streams: yes
Client Encrypt: no
Checkpoint: yes
Interval: 15
Policy Priority: 0
Max Jobs/Policy: Unlimited
Disaster Recovery: 0
Collect BMR info: no
Residence: diskstage-basic1
Volume Pool: Daily
Server Group: *ANY*
Keyword: (none specified)
Data Classification: -
Residence is Storage Lifecycle Policy: no
Application Discovery: no
Discovery Lifetime: 28800 seconds
ASC Application and attributes: (none defined)
Granular Restore Info: no
Ignore Client Direct: no
Enable Metadata Indexing: no
Index server name: NULL
Use Accelerator: no
HW/OS/Client: Windows-x64 Windows2008 sukcw-pwl-bak01
Include: C:\Temp\DCG-Temp
Schedule: Manual_Full
Type: Full Backup
Frequency: every 7 days
Maximum MPX: 1
Synthetic: 0
Checksum Change Detection: 0
PFI Recovery: 0
Retention Level: 1 (6 days)
Number Copies: 1
Fail on Error: 0
Residence: (specific storage unit not required)
Volume Pool: (same as policy volume pool)
Server Group: (same as specified for policy)
Residence is Storage Lifecycle Policy: 0
Schedule indexing: 0
Daily Windows:
Monday 10:30:00 --> Monday 11:30:00
Schedule: Weekly_Synthetic
Type: Full Backup
Frequency: every 7 days
Maximum MPX: 1
Synthetic: 1
Checksum Change Detection: 0
PFI Recovery: 0
Retention Level: 1 (6 days)
Number Copies: 1
Fail on Error: 0
Residence: (specific storage unit not required)
Volume Pool: (same as policy volume pool)
Server Group: (same as specified for policy)
Residence is Storage Lifecycle Policy: 0
Schedule indexing: 0
Daily Windows:
Monday 13:00:00 --> Monday 14:00:00
Schedule: Daily_Incremental
Type: Differential Incremental Backup
Frequency: every 1 hour
Maximum MPX: 1
Synthetic: 0
Checksum Change Detection: 0
PFI Recovery: 0
Retention Level: 0 (2 days)
Number Copies: 1
Fail on Error: 0
Residence: (specific storage unit not required)
Volume Pool: (same as policy volume pool)
Server Group: (same as specified for policy)
Residence is Storage Lifecycle Policy: 0
Schedule indexing: 0
Daily Windows:
Monday 11:00:00 --> Monday 13:10:00
E:\Program Files\Veritas\NetBackup\bin\admincmd>
12-16-2013 04:01 AM
Just set-up & ran my own test policy - thought I'd found an issue but it was 'user error' (apparently if your window is set to open/close on a Sunday it won't run on a Monday!! ).
Once that 'error' was rectified my incremental ran as expected & would expect the synthetic to also (we *do* actually run synthetics on a weekly basis).
Does the incremental appear in the output of nbpemreq?
If syntax is the same (still running an unsupported version here):
nbpemreq -predict -date 12/24/2013 -due
(use nbpemreq -updatepolicies following any policy changes - esp. for immediate tests - if that's still a valid command ;) )
12-16-2013 05:47 AM
thanks Andy... have tested few backups and it was a user error. mis configuration of frequency/calender plus my customer wanted to run synthetic using full as synthetic plus cumulative as synthetic too. i have gone back to basics and tested full, inc and synth and all ran and worked fine. yes that command syntex is still good. ;) i will mark your post as a solution to give you some points. ;)